7.
The Spiritual Meaning of Freedom
From a talk given at the Wiltern
Theatre, Sunday morning, July 4, 1937.
Ever since the dawn of civilization, ever since the first humans began
to grasp the significant fact that they were individual beings in a universe
that seemed to be more or less hostile to them, the entire search of the
human mind, its whole endeavor, has been to get free from evil, from bondage
and the shackles of lack, want, fear, superstition, uncertainty, pain,
disease, poverty, and fear of the hereafter. And because of this, human
systems exist -- organized philosophies spring up, sciences develop, educational
systems are conducted, collective security is sought after, and religions
are formulated to allay the fear of humankind relative to the soul.
The great demand in the world today is for a sense of security, freedom,
and liberty. But we must be very certain that we do not swap one image
of bondage for another. I have read a large part of the religious and philosophic
history of the world and I have noticed that almost invariably, when the
world traded one kind of religion for another, it didn't get a good deal.
The Pilgrim Fathers who came to the shores of New England came to worship
God in their own way, but the moment they got there, everybody in the colony
worshiped God in the way that the strong-minded members of that colony
decided was the way to worship God. That was not freedom.
Even in our newer religions of the last seventy-five or a hundred years,
very frequently we meet people who say they have now found the truth, and
then, unfortunately, a large majority of them disclose that they merely
have found an idea they liked and called it the truth because they were
egotistical, self-conscious, self-righteous people with an attitude of
condemnation toward others. That is not the truth. In studying one system
of thought after another that has transpired in the last seven thousand
years of human history, I have noted how extremely difficult it is for
the human mind to conceive liberty without license, without egotism; and
we can only give birth to freedom when we have conceived liberty.
True freedom -- true liberty -- has something cosmic behind it. If the
time has come that modern science has proved that we cannot move a piece
of paper without changing the balance of the entire physical universe;
if we have come to the place where we know that the stuff of which our
physical bodies are made is the same stuff of which the planets are made;
if we have come to the place where such a profound unity is maintained
that physicists believe there is no such thing as disunity in the physical
world; then we can easily see what the great spiritual leaders of the ages
meant when they told us of that greater unity in which we all live and
move and have our being, and that the idea of freedom itself is tied up
with the true concept of the unity of good. If our nature is one, if God
is one -- and we know that God must be one, for the universe cannot be
divided against itself -- then we are all tied into an indivisible unity.
We shall have to get back to this unity to find the meaning of freedom.
Nothing in any part of this cosmic whole could be considered freedom that
would destroy the liberty of some other part of it. That would be self-destruction,
would it not? As Jesus pointed out two thousand years ago, that would be
a kingdom divided against itself. The kingdom of God is one kingdom. So
we know that true liberty must spring from true unity.
We are bound into a supreme unity, we are tied into an immutable law of
irrevocable cause and effect -- that is unity moving into action. Cause
and effect is something that happens as a result of the use of unity. Consequently
we are one even while we are many, and since each one of us is a part of
the whole, if we seek to destroy each other we only ultimately hurt ourselves.
That is the great lesson of life.
Freedom, then, will come only in such degree as we no longer do anything
that hurts anyone, but that does not mean we have to become spiritual or
intellectual doormats. I do not believe in that. Nothing in my belief causes
me to feel that God or the Creative Principle wants me to suffer for myself
or for anyone else. I do it, I have always done it, perhaps I always shall
in this world -- but I know that it is wrong. How can the Supreme Being
desire my suffering without imposing that suffering, and what kind of a
universe has a God who suffers and imposes suffering in a changeless reality?
The whole theology and religious reaction of people who believe that arises
out of morbidity and fear and superstition and nothing else.
Well, it is not so -- and still we suffer. Why? Because we do not understand.
We might say that the world suffered darkness until somebody discovered
electricity. It suffered crawling around on the face of the earth until
technology was developed so we could fly and drive. It suffers limitation,
not because the Infinite imposes limitation, but because the world does
not understand its freedom. And when it begins to develop its freedom,
seldom does it do it directly; it generally creates a new bondage. When
we kill the old devil we are very likely to give birth to a new and more
subtle one. War is more to be feared than ever before because we have more
knowledge without more wisdom. And final freedom will come only as it is
tied into divine wisdom.
What is divine wisdom? I am no prophet, but I would suggest that divine
wisdom must be as simple and profound as this: Jesus said, "The kingdom
of God cannot be divided against itself." I think that is all there
is to divine wisdom. The kingdom of God cannot and will not be divided;
so long as I will seek to hurt, I will be hurt.
We desire freedom. We do not like evil, we do not like pain, we do not
like poverty, we do not like unhappiness. Why should we? None of us likes
to go to bed and worry all night and get up tired out in the morning. God
does not impose it on us. Why do we do it? Because we sense freedom, we
sense liberty, we sense God, yet out here in the objective world we experience
limitation; and the argument is between what we feel ought to take place
and what we see and the world experiences. It seems as though we are two
people, one that experiences evil and one that knows there should be no
evil.
The evolution of freedom in the human mind is a slow process. Many movements
in the world that claim to be seeking liberty only produce new kinds of
bondage. We should beware of them. They are born out of the idea of depression;
they are born out of the spirit of bondage. If we want freedom, we must
understand that freedom can never come by the imposition of a will of the
minority over the majority. It is born finally, and only in such degree
as some system is devised whereby individuals are allowed complete freedom
so long as they do not, in their freedom, impose bondage on someone else.
I believe that the true spirit of democracy is a spiritual conception where
there is freedom, liberty without license, and a flexibility that makes
evolution possible on the foundation of freedom. As we enter into the spirit
of the meaning of Independence Day, the day when liberty, symbolically,
was conceived, the day when freedom, objectively, in our country was announced,
we should think of it not merely as a political system or form of government,
but we should think of it as a spiritual conception, an idea in the Divine
Mind Itself, taking form in human experience; we should learn to love that
liberty, and in loving the idea we should learn to tenderly and prayerfully
handle the embodiment of that idea and nourish it always to greater strength;
we should really conceive again the great spiritual conception of that
rugged man of God who said: "...that government of the people, by
the people, and for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
Back
| Next |
Index